Got Cone?

Critique Style Requested: Standard

The photographer is looking for generalized feedback about the aesthetic and technical qualities of their image.

Description

This guy was racing around the tree and stopped when it saw me.

Specific Feedback

Any thoughts appreciated.

Technical Details

Canon R5; 100-500 with 1.4 TC at 420 mm; 1/1000 at f10, +1 1/3 EV; ISO 51,200 (amazing what NR software can do-DxO in this case).


Critique Template

Use of the template is optional, but it can help spark ideas.

  • Vision and Purpose:
  • Conceptual:
  • Emotional Impact and Mood:
  • Composition:
  • Balance and Visual Weight:
  • Depth and Dimension:
  • Color:
  • Lighting:
  • Processing:
  • Technical:

A beautiful story telling frame with solid techs !
In fact I’m surprised at the quality of 100-500 zoom with TC.!
In fact I had that lens for a brief period, wasn’t happy about the quality at 500 mm as I used to compare it with prime 500.
Do you think, DxO is better than Topaz ??

1 Like

Thanks for commenting, Jagdeep. Based on the comparisons I ran between LR Denoise, Topaz, and DxO, I felt DxO gave the best results.