Hornet (+revised)

Revised Version

Revision 1 (latest)

What changed: Opened up the shadows on the face and increased vignette.
Improved things slightly, painted on a bit of colour on the OOF antenna - all part of a learning process

Added after receiving feedback from the community.


Original Version

Critique Style: Standard

The photographer is looking for thoughtful feedback on the image as a whole, especially around the areas noted below.

Feedback Focus: Artistic / Expressive

About This Image

More playing with new lens and seeing how it performs

Shooting into the sun at high iso has left some chromatic aberrations but pleased with sharpness

“Foreleg Cleaning Antennae pose” I call it !

Feedback Requested

any and all comments welcome

Just playing

Technical Details

Camera: SONY ILCE-7M5
Lens: FE 100-400mm F4.5-5.6 GM OSS + 2X Teleconverter
Focal length: 576mm
Shutter speed: 1/1000s
Aperture: f/11
ISO: 2500

Superb depth of field and perspective. It appears to me that you have been bugged quite a bit lately. Keep up the good work. I also have this lens and it is outstanding. But I find my x2 extender doesn’t have the same image quality as the 1.4.
Just an observation.

1 Like

@David_Schoen Thanks for your kind comments.
I will ask Santa for the 1.4 if I can. I’m quite happy with the 2x but I have also heard the 1.4 is optically better and obviously doesn’t slow the lens so much.

Because I enjoy shooting into the sun I need to experiment how far I can under-expose and still get the shadow detail. Winter coming will surely force the iso up :frowning:

Regards

huw

Unfortunately with macro, shooting into the sun can be challenging for sure. I find the shadows on the face of the hornet to be a slight distraction in the comp. Next time, go with f16 and cut your shutter speed in half for better DOF. The 2x TC reduced the micro-contrast slightly and that can be recovered in post-processing. Otherwise, you captured a nice pose and the off-centered comp worked well for this photo. Well done…Jim

1 Like

Huw: Not sure I want to get up close and personal with one of these guys but still a fine capture. I’m going to be lazy (I’m exceptionally good at that) and just ditto @Jim_Zablotny regarding DOF and using a 2x. Nicely done. >=))>

1 Like

In this case, I really like the dof you had, Huw, as it focuses my attention on nothing but the face. If so inclined, you might look at a crop that puts the hornets face a bit higher in the frame so it gives more of an impression of staring the viewer straight in their face. I think you could achieve a bit more menacing look that way.

1 Like

Huw, the pose looks good and you’ve got great detail in the head and face. The specular relfections off the top of the eyes and the head can be many times brighter the the colors of the surroundings, which makes them nearly impossible to fix or remove in processing without cloning. Using a polarizer can dramatically reduce (0r even remove) specular reflections. When the chip is hit with a specular reflection there is “spill over” of charges into the neighboring pixels which often takes on particular colors. I do think that a bit more depth-of-field (so that the bases of it’s antenna are sharp woulg be a subtle, but nice improvement. The eyes and mouthparts look great.

1 Like

thank @Mark_Seaver I think I was using a circular polariser but the angles may not have been optimal

I will take on board the recommendation for f/16 and 1/500 or even 1/250th, I also have been routinely post-processing with David’s PS Action.

So much to learn - but I feel I’m improving
Thanks for everyones help

Huw

The original poster added a revised version of their image.