A Crown Within A Crown ~ final edit shown first

Critique Style Requested: Standard

The photographer is looking for generalized feedback about the aesthetic and technical qualities of their image.

Description

A Crown Within A Crown

Glacier National Park is known by some as the Crown of the Continent. While this may be geographically true, it is also true in terms of sheer natural beauty. Time and the elements have collaborated in a feat of artistry that has inspired human artists for generations upon generations of both Indigenous peoples and more recent visitors to the area. In this photo, Mount Oberlin, Clements Mountain, and Mount Cannon stand watch over Bird Woman Falls. All their lofty spires create a bit of a crown within the crown of the Park. The glaciers that carved the bowl from which the falls originate have long since vanished, but their effect on the landscape has left a stunning scene for us to admire. We drove up late one night to see how it looked under the stars and we were not disappointed! If you’ve stood at this viewpoint along Going to the Sun Road during the day, you’ll appreciate the thrill that it is to stand at the edge in the dark! I was even fortunate enough to have captured a meteor while the shutter was open. Believe it or not, there were also 15 satellite streaks during one 10 second exposure, but I removed those!

Specific Feedback

I wasn’t actually thinking I would like this as I captured it given the lack of a foreground. This is along Going to the Sun Road and there is a large chasm right in front of me, so a close foreground was out of the question. Then, during one of the exposures, a meteor streaked overhead. I worked this one quite a bit. I usually stack for noise reduction but this is a single for the sky and a single for the mountains, blended using the sky replacement tool in Photoshop. I warped the lower end to keep the composition but remove headlights from the road far below! Does the lack of a close foreground work ok, after all, the Milky Way is far enough away the the mountains are pretty close relatively speaking!

Technical Details

Nikon D850
Sigma Art 20mm 1.4
Sky~ISO 5000, f/1.8, 10 seconds
Land~ ISO 1250, f/1.8, 102 seconds

Each are single images blended using the sky replacement tool in Photoshop. I used the Mini Stars action in Photoshop, Topaz Denoise for the land and processed the image in Lightroom Classic CC.


Critique Template

Use of the template is optional, but it can help spark ideas.

  • Vision and Purpose:
  • Conceptual:
  • Emotional Impact and Mood:
  • Composition:
  • Balance and Visual Weight:
  • Depth and Dimension:
  • Color:
  • Lighting:
  • Processing:
  • Technical:
1 Like

It works for me! There is realistic detail in the FG and good interest with the curve of the mountainside echoing the angle of the MW. Nice catch on the meteor!! I wonder about reducing or darkening the cyan/green in the UR, but it does add some interest. The stars are as good as it gets for a camera lens. I like the sky getting lighter and the stars less obvious toward the horizon.

Did you do a denoise for the sky? It looks good – I’m always in search of the best way to get good results, whether stacking several exposures or denoise on one. Stacking is said to need 10-15 to get maybe a stop in NR.

1 Like

I hadn’t really noticed that upper corner, but did a linear gradient mask to get rid of it and I do like it better. I did Denoise with Lightroom and then sharpened with Topaz. I also used Ministars. The light behind the mountains is from the city of Kalispell, but it’s low enough in relation the mountains to not really be a problem. I think there was some low level smoke down there too, which you can see some sort of streaks from at the lower right. I agree that it actually adds to the look of the sky. I’ve attached the reworked one here as well as a version where I used 10 light and 30 dark to stack for the sky and added the same foreground in using sky replacement. I always have a heck of a time replicating the look from one image to the next, but I think I like the tones in the stacked image better, but it removes the meteor


1 Like

I think the rework of the original is a nice improvement. I think the lighter FG is better in the top image of these last two but the sky tonalities and MW detail are better in the original. You could probably pull out a bit more detail with a soft-edged mask.

1 Like

Thanks Diane. I think I have about filled the computer’s memory with all my version of this shot! I added one last edit to the top!

I think you’ve hit the mark with the last edit! Excellent work!

We all need longer lenses, wider lenses and bigger computers.

1 Like

You did a lot of work here to get this impressive image to perfection!
Congrats on a nice EP!

1 Like