Well, Youssef, I like both images. I agree with @Lon_Overacker that at first glance it looks like the erratic is floating.
I also agree that the pano could use a little more of the slab, and you might consider cropping the pine on the far right.
Additionally, I think the mid tones need a bit of a boost in both images.
Having been at Olmstead many times, I do not recall ever seeing this rock. You have a unique image here, I think.
OK, so you and I both have studied physics, as have others here, I’m sure. It is apparent that the center of mass of the boulder is low and left, since that is the only way it can balance as it is. I can see a bulge in the rock there which mean greater mass there. Granite, being rather homogenous generally, this boulder may have slightly greater density in the lower portion, but there is no way to verify that. In any event, it’s very mysterious, and causes one to pause in thought.
To think that this huge rock was carried by a glacier and then left balanced after the ice melted, on a previously glaciated slab of granite is quite remarkable.
Thanks for sharing such a thought provoking and nice image!
-P