The photographer is looking for generalized feedback about the aesthetic and technical qualities of their image.
Description
I’ve been going through my Death Valley photos from a 2018 workshop and reprocessing some or having a first go at others. This is one that I’d already processed, but looking at it with new eyes I felt the processing could be improved, so I started over.
Specific Feedback
Any comments welcome. I can’t remember if the stratigraphy was that blue (my original processing had it very blue!) or not. I’ve toned it down some.
Technical Details
Made with my trusty D3100 and 55-300 lens. No polarizer, on a tripod. Processed in ACR & PS for basic targed exposure adjustments to bring more attention to the bush.
This is gorgeous, @Bonnie_Lampley! All of the colors look perfect to me, and I’d say your overall processing is spot on. If anything, I may prefer a touch more room on the right side so the bush would have a little extra breathing room. Definitely not a deal breaker, though. This is really neat!
Wonderful nature image Bonnie. The lines and graphics are very strong, but having the added texture, details and colors really make this stand out. Of course that lone plant turns this in to a great nature story. Subtle, but I also like seeing the dried grasses/plants and the on skeletal remain on the lower tier. Subtle because with those elements, really enhance the presence and/or survivability of the vibrant plant seemingly flourishing in this environment. Hence, the “nature story” for me.
Combine the nature story with solid composition and you’ve got a winner.