Thanks for the responses guys.
@Harley_Goldman I wanted to ask you to expand on “manual focusing.” I know it sounds silly and it should be obvious. However, I think there could be different definitions and methods of manually focusing. Does manual focus mean you’re simply using the focus ring with AF turned off - but you’re still relying on the green dot in viewfinder? OR are you deciding the image is in focus by literally looking in the viewfinder and watching the image go in and out of focus (much like we did with LF?) OR are you manually using Live View to manually focus?
I only mention this because I’ve been reading and learning. Maybe everyone knows this and I didn’t - If so, please indulge me. There are TWO different focus systems (at least in Nikon, can’t speak to others.) Looking through the viewfinder you’re using the Phase Detection focusing system which is NOT, NOT the same focusing as using Live View (LV). In LV, the mirror is UP and the focus in directly measured on the sensor! This is called Contrast detection focusing When you focus in the viewfinder, regardless if you’re using the green dot to confirm focus, or the naked eye - you’re not seeing and focusing what the sensor sees!!(at least real time). There is a separate sensor/system/firmware whatever that is processing and presenting what the camera thinks is in focus.
When in manual, even though the cameras are all digital… are we still seeing an analogue view in the viewfinder? ie. the image comes through the glass of the lens, bounces off the mirror and directly out the viewfinder/eyepiece? If that’s true and those mechanics are still all manual and analog, then I can see the value of focusing manually.
If there is any interruption in the image details between the lens and the eyepiece (sensors, digitization, etc.), even though you’re in manual mode, you’re still relying on digital electronics to view the image in the viewfinder.
Anyway, back to Live View. I found out through experimenting and then confirmed online by reading, that indeed Live View and the Viewfinder have two different focusing systems. And to that point, the AF Fine Tune process I was originally asking about DOES NOT apply or work when using LV. It only works for Phase Detection focusing. I confirmed that as I performed a bunch of test images using Live View and turning on AF Fine Tune. I took dozens of shots changing the AF Fine Tune settings each time and the results were there wasn’t any differences in any of the images despite changing the settings! This had be scratching my head, but then made perfect sense after I learned that AF Fine Tune has no impact using Live View.
Further comparisons between LV and VF (Live View, Viewfinder) brought very revealing results. So far, it’s pretty clear that the focusing using LV provides the best sharpness. Even after fine tuning to death using VF.
This is a huge deal for most any other type of photography besides Landscape, maybe architecture. Wedding photographers, street, sports, journalists, etc. rely on the viewfinder almost exclusively right? Therefore AF Fine tuning is probably pretty important to maximize focusing and sharpness for a particular lens/camera combination.
In landscape photography not as much. Although there are reasons why folks might not use LV - battery usage for one main reason.
This whole process so far has also helped me confirm why I’ve been seeing such good results in terms of sharpness and detail when I do focus stacking. I use Live View to focus!.
Well, I’m finding this all very interesting and educational. Maybe you all already knew this…
Now it’s time to go finish putting the lenses to more testing. Thanks for listening.
If I get a chance I’ll post some pics
Lon