Creative Self-Expression When Everyone is a Photographer

Originally published at: https://www.naturephotographers.network/creative-self-expression-when-everyone-is-a-photographer/

“There is no such thing as a new idea. It is impossible. We simply take a lot of old ideas and put them into a sort of mental kaleidoscope. We give them a turn and they make new and curious combinations. We keep on turning and making new combinations indefinitely; but they are the same old pieces of colored glass that have been in use through all the ages.”

Mark Twain

It’s been estimated that in 2022, around 1.5 trillion photos will be taken worldwide.  The vast majority of these images will be smartphone snaps that won’t warrant more than the thumb scroll’s worth of attention they’ll get.  Nevertheless, unless you live entirely offline, it’s difficult not to notice which photographs are liked, shared, commented on, purchased, and so forth.  Trends form out of the fray, and expectations around art and self-expression shift.  The digital age has produced a culture in which a persistent pressure to create original work exists and yet conformity is rewarded with attention.  Perhaps this is not a new phenomenon.

Is it possible to contribute creative work that is original in what feels like an infinite sea of information and possibilities?  Should we insulate ourselves from that pressure and prevent any external factors from influencing our creative output, perhaps through photographic celibacy?  If so, what about the integral roles of inspiration and learning to the creative process?  Is embracing isolation a fair exchange for seeking originality?  Perhaps that works for some.  Or maybe we should let go of the idea of creating something original and instead focus on creating something that is self-expressive, a reflection of what we connected with in the landscape.

These are some of the questions I grapple with as I attempt to understand and develop my own approach to creative self-expression through my photography.

Before we dive deeper, I’d like to define what I mean by creative self-expression because it can mean different things to different people.  In terms of nature photography, I consider creative self-expression to be the process of tuning in to what you connect with in the landscape and translating that photographically so that you can visually communicate that experience with others.  Thus, I distinguish the concept of creating personally-expressive photographs from having a “style” or “voice” that is defined by some aesthetic that can be associated with, or derived from, one’s collection of photographs. 

According to Mark Twain, a new idea is actually just a new combination of existing ideas.  In other words, these new combinations and connections require starting material, and that comes from our human experience; we learn from exploration, conversations, relationships, educational opportunities, adversities, successes, entertainment, and so on.  Learning and creating are inextricably linked in this way.

Ansel Adams said, “You bring to the act of photography all the pictures you have seen, the books you have read, the music you have heard, the people you have loved.”  It actually helps your creative process to have multiple sources from which to draw new and interesting connections and combinations.  No one who has become a master of an art or a craft has done so without inspiration, study, contemplation, discovery, and practice. 

If creativity is the generation of new connections between existing ideas, then it’s the connection we draw that is original, innovative, or unique.  By extension, I propose that what you connect with in the landscape – what catches your eye and draws you in – that moment of perception is the key to creating personally-expressive nature photographs.  The connection you make with the landscape is novel in its own right because it originates from the context of your lived experience.  

So how do we discover those points of connection with the natural world?

I believe there are four vehicles that can help us connect more deeply with nature and discover compositions that are a reflection of the connections we make.  The four vehicles are: Observation, Curiosity, Resonance, and Practice.  Let’s go through each of these starting with a definition from the Britannica Dictionary for each one.

Observation: “the act of careful watching and listening”

Elliot Porter said, “Photography is an art of observation. It has little to do with the things you see and everything to do with the way you see them”. 

A key aspect of connecting with the landscape is to be aware.  The act of observation helps us to become more aware of our surroundings and to keep our minds open to possibilities rather than restrict our minds with expectations.  

A simple way to become more observant is to tune into your senses.  Ask yourself – what do I hear? Smell?  Feel?  See?  Try to list out multiple options before moving on.  The process of tuning into our senses and bringing an awareness to our surroundings helps shift our minds from looking to seeing, hearing to listening, and reacting to feeling.  By slowing your process down and being observant, you give yourself more opportunities to see things that first went unnoticed, such as seeing more abstractly in terms of light, lines, shapes, contrast, color, etc., and identifying potential compositions.

Curiosity: “the desire to learn or know more about something or someone”

Some people are naturally curious, but according to Dr. Bréne Brown in her recent book, Atlas of the Heart, curiosity is both a trait and a state – meaning, curiosity is a quality that we can cultivate.  Many of us got into landscape or nature photography because of our love of the natural world.  Our passion for the outdoors is often fueled by experiences of awe, whether that’s sleeping under a dark, starry sky, feeling the spray of a waterfall, or seeing how light plays with the shape and color of a flower petal.  

According to Dr. Brown, when we experience awe we feel small and overcome by the vastness of something, and we also feel more connected to ourselves, to each other, and to the universe.  Awe is what stops us in our tracks and takes our breath away when we experience it.

Often, awe leads to wonder.  The difference between these two emotions is that wonder includes curiosity.  Wonder leads us to explore, and it fuels us to want to understand and connect more to the thing that inspired awe in us in the first place. 

I believe that curiosity is fundamental to forming that unique connection with the landscape that leads to creating personally-expressive photographs.  

If you find you are not a naturally curious person, you can start by putting your detective’s hat on and taking an inquisitive approach.  As yourself, what does my eye keep going back to in the scene?  What is drawing me in?  Why?  Is it the light, color, a leading line, an area of contrast or texture?  What else do I see?  And what else?  What if I go over there?  Will that change the nature of the light?  What can I learn about the ecology of what I’m photographing?  What’s the story nature is sharing with me right now?  I wonder…?

Curiosity is a motivating state that drives us to close a gap of knowledge or to understand something more deeply.  The input of that knowledge comes from observation and awareness.

Resonance: “a quality that makes something personally meaningful or important to someone”

You’ve likely heard the saying, “we’re on the same wavelength”, to mean that you and someone else are aligned in some way.  Usually, the term resonance is used to describe waveforms, like sound waves or vibrations, that align and amplify each other in a system.  But even those among us who are not physicists are familiar with what it means to resonate with something or someone.  To feel understood, to experience an alignment of ideas, or to simply to feel boosted in some way.  That’s resonance.

I believe what underlies contemplative photography, expressive photography, slow photography, mindful photography, and creative photography is resonance.

So what resonates with you in the landscape?  What do you enjoy exploring?  What do you feel aligned with or in harmony with while out in nature?  What gets you motivated to get outside?  What gets you excited or full of awe and wonder?  What makes you want to stay in nature for longer?  What inspires you in other people’s photographs?   What would you photograph if no one saw your pictures?  

In the simple, but wise words of Marie Kondo, what sparks joy?  Make photographs of THAT, and a world of self-expression will open up to you.

Practice: “the activity of doing something again and again in order to become better at it”

Above all else, practice.  

Practicing gets a bad rap sometimes.  “Go practice your scales again” rarely inspired motivation and creativity in the young piano student.  But we can only get better at something if we do it often and do it regularly.  Practice does not make perfect; practice makes progress, and since creative work has no endpoint, progress is all we can measure.

I discussed the concept of photography as a practice rather than as a form of artistic expression or as a technical craft in Episode 40 of the Outdoor Photography Podcast.  As someone with a musical and sports background, I have spent countless hours practicing.  However, I’ve realized that I have not approached my photography with the same level of dedicated, consistent practice, and it’s something I’d like to change.  So, I’ve wondered what would photography as a practice look like? 

Like musical scales and hockey drills, I think one aspect of practicing photography involves some of the less-inspiring, repetitive actions that propel our skills forward in terms of muscle memory.  For example, being able to adjust exposure settings without taking your eye from the viewfinder only comes after repetitive action, mistake-making, and more repetitive action.  Becoming technically competent and working your camera with ease so that it becomes an extension of you can’t be hacked or shortcutted; it comes from hours spent handling the camera.

Another type of practice may be to dedicate yourself to the study of photography for a period of time, like an immersion program for learning a new language.  This may or may not include a physical component, but rather it could be reading books on photography and composition, listening to photography podcasts, working on a personal photography project, starting a mentoring relationship with a photographer whose work you respect, or moving outside your comfort zone with a particular kind of post-processing method.

If practice is a repetitive act, then another way to think about practicing photography is forming a photography habit.  One way to start a new habit is to figure out the smallest action or step you can take that will lead you in the direction you want to head.  An example that is often given when discussing habit formation is flossing.  If you want to develop the habit of flossing every day, then just commit to flossing one tooth.  That is the only action you need to take, but often that leads us to flossing more than one tooth, and by committing to the small step, we end up developing the desired habit over time.  

One way that I’ve incorporated this concept into my practice of photography is to always get my gear ready after I come back from doing photography.  I have learned that I’m much more likely to embrace a random moment to do some photography if my batteries are charged, my camera and lenses are clean, my memory card has room on it, etc.  It’s very easy to get back from a photography outing and just let your gear sit until the next time you have a trip or hike planned.  But when I did this, there was just enough friction in the system that I would resist or debate going out and often chose not to.  By committing to cleaning and organizing my gear when I return from a hike, I’ve made it easier to grab my camera and go when an opportunity arises.

Lastly, as you consider the ways in which creating a photography practice would be helpful to your growth as a self-expressive creator, keep in mind that practice requires two things: commitment and repetition.  As simple as it sounds, rewarding consistency is usually a more effective accountability measure than keeping track of outcomes or goals achieved.  Staying consistent is difficult, so celebrate your consistency with something that will excite you and bring you joy.  It’s incredibly motivating.

The next time you find yourself plagued by comparisonitis or self-doubt about your creative potential or ability to create something original, I encourage you to return to these four vehicles of observation, curiosity, resonance, and practice.  I can’t wait to see what you make.

7 Likes

Hi Brenda,

There are several dualisms in your essay. First, Originality versus Conformity (first paragraph). Second, Creative Self Expression versus Style (third paragraph). How do you differentiate these dualisms? Can you expand on what you mean with these?

2 Likes

It was a pleasure to read this and it was also with a keen interest that I followed each expressive word. Thank you so much Brenda Petrella.
John Wayne Williams
Photographer

1 Like

Great advice and well stated.

Thank you!

Ed Schlotzhauer
photos.schlotzcreate.com
blog.schlotz.net

1 Like

Dear Brenda,

Although not an entirely new idea (no pun or criticism intended) your take on originality is interesting reading. If I can be permitted to be devil’s advocate I would go one step further and say not only are there no new ideas but submit for your thoughts that photography as a medium is not original and cannot be original. After all, every photo taken is of something that exist and therefore the photograph cannot be original. This might be the reason many art critics and even some painters don’t consider photography to be an art form. Rather considered a science. I would even go further to suggest that the “art” of photography is not self-expression unless you’re manipulating the image to be something other than what it was at the point in time at which the photograph was taken which is interestingly considered taboo by many so called photographic “purists”, of which I am admittedly one.

2 Likes

I like your article Brenda. I think you’ve tackled a big subject. An important subject. It piqued my interest and made me think about the points you make. I am also glad that you posted here because I have never heard of you before and it prompted me to look at your podcast. I spent an hour listening to your @Alister_Benn podcast and I was quite impressed with your interviewing abilities. You are good with the spoken word and your spontaneous questions are responsive rather than cliche.

This article cover so much ground that it’s difficult to comment in a comprehensive way. So I’ll just talk about style. When people talk about style they often mean something like Cubism as a style Picasso painted in. Something so distinctive that it stands out from other art forms. But style is usually much more subtle. This past week I discovered the work of Isaac Levitan. Although he painted the same landscapes as Ivan Shishkin note how different they are. And yet you can’t really describe what is the difference. You know it when you see it but you can’t define what it is. I believe there is nothing special about style. It’s just an expression of how you see the world. Your style is you. But your images have to be about you and not the object you’re photographing. You don’t have to invent a new unique way of shooting or processing images to have a style.

One additional thing. I wish your images in this article were linked to larger versions of them. @David_Kingham

1 Like

Great write-up, Brenda, and great to see you here on NPN!
I agree with everything you said, and these are practical steps that can be used for self-expression. I also agree that the concept of style is over-used… so nicely done!

1 Like

I agree, and the way I have dealt with this conundrum is to see out unique conditions. For example, when I photographed comet NEOWISE last year, I am pretty sure I was the only photographer who captured it at certain locations and times. So, in that sense it was essentially original, since NEOWISE won’t be back for 6,800 years! :slight_smile:

1 Like

This is such a huge subject, and I’m glad you are tackling it here. I love to hear others’ take on it since I think about it more and more as I approach my fourth year as a gallery owner. Do I sacrifice my own interests for the sake of a paycheck, by producing images that don’t sell? When starving is the alternative, it’s an easy decision–the key is to find that intersection of what sells and what inspires you.

1 Like

Hi Alain,
Thank you for your comment. The first dualism you noted (originality vs conformity) is a conundrum that I feel is the result of social media. One one hand, you need to stand out in some way because attention has become commoditized, and so a pressure to be original (or a trend-setter, if you will for this discussion) builds. However, on the other hand, some types of images go viral, or are at least popular enough that the vast majority of people with cameras (not photographers, per se) see the value (again, of attention) in following the trend to get noticed. I believe this digital-social culture we are in leads to a dilution of creating personally meaningful work. I think it’s especially challenging if you are trying to earn a living from photography.

The second dualism you mentioned - self-expression vs style - I think these ideas are often used interchangeably, and I wanted to distinguish them in the article to make the point that I think self-expression has more permanence than style. Creative self-expression (to me) is tuning into what you connect with in the landscape and translating that experience into a composition so that someone else could experience too - it’s regardless or irrespective of style. Style is more of an identifying characteristic of a set of photographs that may be associated with a particular photographer - and that may change over time, or a photographer may choose to not have a particular style.

1 Like

You bet, John! Thanks so much for reading it and for your kind comments.

My pleasure - thanks for reading Ed!

Hi, Brenda. I love your article! It is so on point. Would it be possible for me to include this in a future edition of my photo club’s digital newsletter, Focus? I am on the board and newsletter editor of the Schenectady Photographic Society (NY). You can check us out, and past editions of the Focus, on our website: www.spsphoto.org.

I will, of course, give you credit and include links to your website, blog, etc. And I’ll send you a link when the newsletter is posted. Thank you for your consideration.

Happy Spring!
Linda

LINDA A. TOMMASULO
306 Danielle Drive
Schenectady, NY 12303
Home: 518/280-6965 • Cell: 914/260-4375

1 Like

Hi George,

Thanks for your comment! You make an interesting argument that photography, at least in its “purist” sense cannot be original. I also consider myself more of a purist than a pictorialist; however, I would argue that even we purists are infusing ourselves into our photographs at the time of capture. If you and I were to stand next to each other we likely would create different images of the same scene. We may focus on a different subject, use different focal lengths and depths of field, use different elements to compose the photograph, and so forth. If photography was only a science, then our photographs should be replicas of the scene and of each other with a certain level of accuracy and repeatability. And I don’t do photography to add another datapoint, but rather, to visually communicate what I saw or connected with or experienced in a scene. I think that can be done without manipulating the scene or the final image to be something other than it was at the time of capture.

1 Like

Thank you, Igor! I’m glad you enjoyed the article and have discovered the podcast as well. NPN’s David Kingham was today’s guest! :slight_smile:

Thank you for directing us to the works of Ivan Shishkin and Isaac Levitan. It’s good to see examples outside of photography of how people can express what they connect with in the landscape differently than others connecting with the same or similar landscape.

Thanks, Matt! I appreciate that!

Hi Stan,

I’m glad it’s sparking some interesting discussion! And you’re right - how does one balance creating photographs that sell versus those that we feel most connected to in some way? They may not overlap. I suppose setting aside time to be free to create whatever your heart desires along side compositions that make good prints is one approach to honor both.

1 Like

PS - you can view many of the images on my portfolio site at higher res: https://www.brendapetrella.com

Hi Linda,

I’m glad you liked the article! I would check with @davidkingham on how to best to share the article. You can certainly share the link here.

Hi Brenda,

Thanks for taking time to respond. I am so happy you took my comments in the spirit of which I intended. I whole heartedly agree with you that we can capture different perspectives of the same scene at the same time. However, I still fill that in its “purist” sense, unless a photograph is altered, manipulated if you will, to include or remove something that wasn’t there than it is still just a copy of the scene at the moment and that time. Now please don’t misunderstood me, I still think photography is very unique type of art and I do not condone manipulation other than exposure, contrast, dodging or burning. But then again, I’m ol’ timer. I do respect those that have the ability to artistically manipulate a photograph.

Best Regards,

George

1 Like