unprocessed:
Ok, ICM’s aren’t everyone’s cup of tea, and it could be easily argued they don’t belong here, at least not in Landscape. So this will be the only ICM image I’ll post here from this trip. One of my favorites from the outing to Yosemite this last May. To be sure, I’m a huge fan of ICM’s and I’ve accumulated a large collection of images. I greatly appreciated @Alfredo Mora’s ICM article (although i’ve yet to comment!) and encourage folks to check it out if you haven’t already.)
I’ve never been one to hold much significance to the “this is right out of the camera,” or “this is exactly what was captured on film…”, because as we all know, the modern camera has multitudes of settings, saturation, contrast, sharpness and color space, that saying it came “straight out of the camera,” doesn’t by any stretch mean that’s what was actually experienced. Same with film - was it Provia, KR-64 or Velvia?!?
One of the beauties of ICM is that there are many choices, “no processing required,” OR “process however you want!” There are no rules, no expectations. Only imagination.
Having said all that, the second, unframed version is literally un-processed. Just re-sized for the web. And boy was I glad I had cleaned my sensor prior to this trip and so not even a single dust bunny to clone!
With the ICM, there is of course the motion, the blur, the random and abstract nature of a scene that can be rendered; shapes, lines; patterns, etc. etc. One of the most fun aspects for me is how many colors are revealed and captured. Reminds me very much of Tony Kuyper’s earlier work where he routinely “revealed” colors in scenes that were always there, just never brought out in a typical photograph. ICM does a similar thing.
Yes, agreed that ICM is a random, “have no idea what you’re gonna get” approach to photography… But one can learn, grow and recogize situations, light and patterns that can reveal very pleasing results. There is finess, technique and sometimes even purpose… In the end, we each get to decide and enjoy.
Hope you enjoy this one!
Specific Feedback Requested
Feedback - any and all comments and suggestions. the framed version is only slightly processed with vibrance and contrast. Otherwise, not much difference in the two.
Technical Details
Nikon D800E, 28-300mm @116mm, f/20 1/4s iso 800