Took a nice drive into the piney part of Minnesota yesterday, looking to see how the ice was developing on the lakes and streams. High stratus clouds guaranteed it would be a black and white day, but that is fine as I really enjoy that kind of photography and would like to be better at it. At Vermillion Falls (yes, in Minnesota our “falls” are usually something less than most, but just imagine going over in a canoe), this collection of of hoar frost crystals growing on the thickening river ice, all under a flaccid sun, really embodies the feel of late November in the North Country. Makes sense, it is late November in the North County, after all.
This composition was very compelling, but rather hard to capture. I knew I wanted the camera to be just a few inches above the frost, but there a large rock right behind made it very difficult to position the tripod flat as there was no room for the third leg. Ultimately, I had to fold it back so that it stuck upright, with the tripod more or less balanced on two legs and the bottom of the shortened center post, all on traction-less ice. There was no way I could look through the view finder with this arrangement, but the glare of the sun and snow made it really difficult to see details in the LCD, too. Furthermore, I assumed that both a focus blend and an exposure blend would be necessary, so futzing with all of that took some patience. Good thing I usually stop noticing the cold when I go “on point” with a camera. My poor, long-suffering partner, who was standing in the trees behind me, is not so lucky.
On the long drive home, we listened to Matt Payne’s latest F-Stop podcast, with William McIntosh, and at one point when discussing artistic creativity, a comment was made about truly creative images being the those that no other landscape photographer would make, even if they were standing there at the same time. I’m not sure if this composition qualifies under that standard, but it is at least a little different (better or worse) than most other black and white Minnesota winter landscape images I have seen.
Post-processing. I don’t like this image at first glance, then it grows on me. When I look away, then look back, I don’t like the image again, but then it grows on me once more. My partner, however, really likes it, so who knows? I wasn’t going to post this here (or anywhere) at all, but she convinced me to see what y’all think.
Is this a composite: No
Processing was even more challenging than making the image in the field, especially since I felt compelled to jump on it as soon as we got home at near 10:00 pm last night after ~15 hours in the car. I first tried the exposure blend I had expected would be necessary, with one image exposed to darken the sky enough to render the sun discernable and a second image that captured the right tone for the foreground frost crystals. But, once blended, the image really looked ridiculous, and I just about gave up. Ultimately, I tried working with only the single sky exposure, and then poured a lot of dodge and burn over various masked curves and levels adjustments to end up at this point. It still looks rather unrealistic to me, but ironically, other than the black and white, it’s actually pretty close to what the eye would see when standing there. You certainly could see the intricacies of the frost and the texture of the clouds while still being able to pull out detail in the trees. I guess the human eye has a pretty good CMOS image sensor, too.
Sony A7R III with Tamron 17-28 mm f/2.8. 17 mm, ISO 50, f/22 at 1/40 sec with a couple of hours of LR and PS processing. I also warped the top corners of the image to remove parallax distortion in the trees and cropped the sides to achieve this result.