Pertinent technical details or techniques: iso 2500, 100-400 plus 1.4, f8, 1250th, handheld, bird in the shade and BG in sun.
(If backgrounds have been removed, etc. please be honest with your techniques to help others learn)
If you would like your image to be eligible for a feature on the NPN Instagram (@NaturePhotoNet), add the tag ‘ig’ and leave your Instagram username below.
Beautiful bird but that’s a tough one to pull off. The IQ has suffered from the severe crop and underexposure. But now that you’ve seen it, perhaps you’ll get another chance to get closer.
Interesting pose you caught it in and you were certainly able to bring out some nice colors from the RAW image. Agree with Jim, nice processing job all things considered. Impressed with the lack of noise on the RAW image at ISO 2500. I’m curious, do you think you’d have done better shooting with the crop function on the Å7R4?
An excellent job of post processing, David. I probably would have trashed this one, but you turned it into a solid, if not spectacular, image. It shows the behavior very well. Nice work. Michelle pointed out the black streak coming back from the eye on this one that wasn’t in the first one and isn’t mentioned in our Hawaiian bird book. Is it by chance a processing artifact? Or could it be a stain from something it ate?
I think I figured out the black streak. Since the bird was so dark in the original, this streak may have been pure black (0,0,0). If that were the case, there wouldn’t be any color information for the software to work on and it would just stay black. I often see little flecks of that in “black” plumage, but they don’t show up against the rest there. An interesting phenomenon.