What technical feedback would you like if any? What artistic feedback would you like if any?
Any feedback is welcome.
Pertinent technical details or techniques:
Single frame, Sony a7, 100-400mm @ 160mm, 1/125s, f/16, ISO 400, (hand held, I think)
Any feedback is welcome.
Single frame, Sony a7, 100-400mm @ 160mm, 1/125s, f/16, ISO 400, (hand held, I think)
Bonnie,
The very first thing that came to mind was “whimsical.” The scattering of light leaves at random over the lightly obscured reflection just makes for a pleasing view.
Any suggestion here would all be of a personal preference nature. Near the center if you took a little bit of an oval shape that encircled most of the central leaves, that area looks a little less contrasty - not quite sure how to describe it - other than to say it’s a little brighter, muddier, less contrasty than the upper third of the image. It carries a little towards the bottom, where I think some simple burning would help.
Love the reflection of the tree trunks and the understated greens; as well as the little bits of ripples giving the reflection some texture and detail. I think playing around with luminosity, contrast, burning, etc. on the bottom 2/3 or so could make this one really pop.
Lon
I really like this, the texture of the water works great for this image. I like in particular, the brighter, greener area in the top left, the contrast and composition of the trees is really nice, would love to have seen a more heavily zoomed version of just that spot.
I’m not a huge fan of the grasses in the foreground, they feel a bit messy in my opinion. I’d go ahead and focus just on the leaves and the reflections.
Bonnie, I like this image a lot. I love the many tones of green and yellow in the scene, and I think your processing of color, WB, contrast, etc. is right on the money. You kept the saturation vibrant without going over the top. I especially like the arrangement of trees in your composition, they are very well organized. I like how they they fan out as you move down the tree trunks.
I agree with @Michael_McGee, losing the reeds at the bottom nicely tightens up the image, and brings attention back to the reflections of the trees, where it belongs.
Bonnie, this is a fine reflection view, with the scattered leaves and cleanly showing tree trunks. I do think that some highlight burning of the grasses along the bottom would reduce their visual impact, letting the reflections and the scattered leaves dominate the view.
Thanks for the input, @Lon_Overacker, @Michael_McGee, @Ed_McGuirk, and @Mark_Seaver.
I agree that the middle of the frame looks less contrasty, and more appealing. I burned the bottom in some, but that made it too contrasty, so I dialed it back. I like Michael’s crop and I have other versions without the grasses, so I’ll have a look at those.
This is the kind of image that really excites me, Bonnie. I don’t have any preference as to your crop or Michael’s crop. Both works really well for me. I would however tame the bright vertical trunk on the very far right of the image.
Bonnie,
This caught my eye as some thing whimsical. The floating leaves cutting through the middle of the reflected trunks works real well creating an abstract image.
I agree on the crop and dealing with the lower contrast muddy area with the leaves.
Here is a cropped version and the muddied area corrected. To correct the muddy area, I made a rough selection of the muddy area with the lasso tool. Then feathered the selection by 200 pixels. Then while selected opened a curves layer, and the selection becomes a layer mask. Then I applied an S-curve adjustment, moving the 64 point down to 43 and the 191 point up to 211 to correct the low contrast. But there is also a color issue so I moved the 128 point down to 115 only on the red channel, down to 120 on the green channel and 122 on the blue channel. The result is below.