Critique Style Requested: Standard
The photographer is looking for generalized feedback about the aesthetic and technical qualities of their image.
Description
This image was about the moment. I got the unexpected opportunity to take a trip to Svalbard. When we came across some bears, we stayed around to see what they would do. This young female got curious and came to check out our boat. She then entertained us and time became meaningless as she dove into the water, rolled on the ice, played with a stick, etc. She finally wandered away, leaving us with a whole lot of images and feeling blessed with a wonderful experience. According to my time stamp, she was with us about an hour and a half from the point it was obvious she was coming to see us until I took my last image of her walking away.
I would say this first stood out as my favorite image, but I have a few I really like. I also missed some, but from those moments I know I was experiencing it with my eyes.
I didn’t initially notice it, but I think it’s kind of ironic that there’s a “heart” standing up in the background ice (to my eye).
This images is on my wall. I recently printed this when there was a sale, just to see how it would come out. She displaced an iceberg, at least temporarily. I only know of a few instances of others who have my images on their walls, and oddly enough none of them are nature photos.
Specific Feedback
Do you notice a color shift? I did not realize that I was having a camera issue. It’s subtle, but I feel like I see it, depending on my screen. Maybe I shouldn’t point it out.
I struggled at first with white balance, but I feel like I got to a place that I like, and it was actually more about exposure. I had underexposed a little. I knew to increase exposure for whites, but I didn’t follow through well.
The ice here was very busy. Do you have any other tips for composition on this?
Anything else?
Technical Details
Sony ILCE-6400, ISO 200, 1/1250s, f/9, no exposure comp
100-400 lens with 1.4x teleconverter, exif says 288mm - I don’t know if that’s the direct reading from the lens, but I would guess so, which means I have a 1.5x crop and a 1.4x teleconverter on top of that putting me right around 600mm FF equivalent, correct?
I will probably never cease to wonder why I didn’t max out my zoom a time or two once she was closer, but it’s one of those things. I think I was too focused on what she was doing and didn’t think to vary anything - or I was afraid to lest I miss something.