An aerial view of the Oregon Coast, looking north. I was hoping for better weather, but you take what you get.
Specific Feedback Requested
Any comments appreciated. Cropped to emphasize the waves up the coast.
Technical Details
10mm, 1/60sec @ f/5, ISO 100, Altitude 119 meters.
1 Like
That looks like proper Oregon Coast weather to me ![:rofl: :rofl:](https://assets.naturephotographers.network/images/emoji/apple/rofl.png?v=12)
It’s a nice documentary representation of the coast, for sure. Not much for me to add ![:slight_smile: :slight_smile:](https://assets.naturephotographers.network/images/emoji/apple/slight_smile.png?v=12)
Nice work, David. It certainly does depict the coast accurately on an overcast day. I’m not sure about the composition though I can’t find a crop that improves it. I’m sure Alex Noriega would come up with some. He was amazing in that regard.
The soft light suits the peaceful composition. I like the wide-angle view with the breakers receding in a gentle curve. The horizon seems to be dropping a bit toward the left, maybe some wide-angle distortion with some optical illusion maybe partially contributing.
Hi David. It’s definitely got a mood to it. I find that I want to see more of the mist and rocks in the background. I cropped it to highlight those features and also give the bring more focus to the breaking waves.
Thanks @Matt_Payne, @Igor_Doncov, @Diane_Miller, and @AndreDonawa for your comments and suggestions.
Diane, I adjusted the horizon a bit. Kinda weird when the drone is supposed to be always horizontal. ![:slightly_smiling_face: :slightly_smiling_face:](https://assets.naturephotographers.network/images/emoji/apple/slightly_smiling_face.png?v=12)
Andre, thanks for your crop suggestion. I thought I liked the wider image, but your crop really works.
Also, I feel this is better in B&W, what do you think?
1 Like
Yes, I think the B&W conversion was a good call. The space on the left side has more interest for me now with the added contrast bringing out the lines and whites in the water
1 Like
B&W is better. Have you considered a vertical of the right half?
1 Like
I know this spot–its on a hill south of Oceanside looking north and is a great vantage point. It was (and still is) always a stop for me on my photo workshops on the Oregon Coast. It’s a bit treacherous,(Please be careful)
![laorcst_anderson1 (1)](https://images.naturephotographers.network/original/3X/e/e/ee6fa3b88cc6d89c34d08dadb2b5c2dd4db75ff6.jpeg)
but during May-June there are some wildflowers on the hillside below that you can add as a foreground. If you can get back there try it… a foreground really helps! The image I am adding is sort of a post-card( not very creative but I use it in my advertising!) of the spot you were. I hope you can make it back!–JG
Thanks Jack, Good to see you here on NPN.
Cheers,
David
David,
I actually think the weather served you well here, especially given the vantage point. ![:slight_smile: :slight_smile:](https://assets.naturephotographers.network/images/emoji/apple/slight_smile.png?v=12)
I think the b&w works very well to highlight the wave patterns, sequence. But certainly your original does too. Touch choice.
Excellent seascape
Lon