Grooming w/Revision

Color Corrected–I hope:

Original Post:

Ring-necked Duck (Aythya collaris)

Happened to catch this one splashing in the water and then grooming…I was pretty pleased that the whole bird was in focus and sharp…

Type of Critique Requested

  • Aesthetic: Feedback on the overall visual appeal of the image, including its color, lighting, cropping, and composition.

Specific Feedback and Self-Critique

I like how this seems to convey a moment of personal grooming.

Technical Details

600mm, 1/800sec @ f/8, ISO 6400

1 Like

Nice sheeting and droplet action on display as well as some nibbly grooming. Ducks are funny. None here yet, but the trumpeters are back on the river now so they probably won’t be long. In the low 40s today so lots of melting going on. It won’t last, but it’s the start. Overall the color looks a tad cyan here, especially in the whites of the feathers. I really like all the water ripples and the action they convey.

Here’s the cyan I mean -

I know color is a bugbear for you, but I thought I’d point it out.

1 Like

Dang, Kris, I need to use you as my color balance eyes, before posting. I’ve uploaded a revision that is warmer…maybe too warm?

Much better, but there are still bits of bright green in the bird’s head and in some of the water reflections. Hm. I’d be curious to see an unedited version to see what’s embedded and what’s processing.

I think the revision is wonderful!! I love the reflection of the duck and the ripples behind it.

There are still a few dots of cyan. Strange artifact…

Maybe I need to just trust my camera’s auto white balance. Here’s the image with the camera’s white balance:

This one isn’t bad but I prefer your first revision, for the lovely and subtle warmth. Auto WB can be thrown off with muted colors.

Thanks Diane, here’s one last try, before going to B&W :slightly_smiling_face:

Actually, not too bad:

It looks good in B&W, but here’s a version I messed with in Photoshop, which I know you don’t use, but maybe the techniques can be duplicated -

I used the TK8 panel to run actions for color correction, clarity and soft pop.

I think a useful technique for wb is to use an eyedropper on a neutral or gray area of the photo if you have them. Auto wb is also hit or miss, especially under cloudy or shady conditions in my experience. It’s a start, but can be fooled which happened here and was quite magenta out of camera, but still oddly had bits of intense green/cyan in the bird’s head and in the water highlights. Wb can be really hard to correct in post if it’s really wrong in camera. I know it’s not that useful for you, but auto wb is probably better to start with.

1 Like

This is a tricky one because of the subtle colors, but I think they are special in this case, and something is lost in going to B/W. This image is subtle, but its definitely not drab.

I pulled the last one into PS and made a curves layer to let me poke around with the neutral eyedropper. I clicked on several points in the darkish feathers above the white side and all gave a close variation of your first revision, at the top of the thread. I’m sure there is a similar tool in your raw converter, and that may be all you need, but it could be fun to play with a slightly different balance in the bird and the water.

If there are neutral tones in an image, that’s usually the best way to get a good color balance to start with.

1 Like

A lot to take in with all the revisions and comments, but I like the first revision. The colors of the bird and water look good to my eye. I like the detail and agree there is an intimate feel with the composition you have. I like to try my bird images in black and white-sometimes it works, sometimes not-but for your shot, I’d go with the color, with the yellow eye, a bit of blue in the beak, and the nice water color.