Critique Style Requested: Standard
The photographer is looking for generalized feedback about the aesthetic and technical qualities of their image.
Description
A cloudless, medium temperature Spring day at Joshua Tree National Park. A friend and I are doing an experiment to compare two brands of film development chemicals: Kodak HC-110 vs. Rodinal.
We took a few images of the same scene with the same TLR camera and same 120mm B&W film. I used the Rodinal developer which is known for showing strong, well-defined grain. We haven’t compared images yet, but I do like the look of these in this sandy, gritty environment!
Specific Feedback
Would appreciate comments about the compositions. I find it difficult out there, and I’m wondering if viewing the scene in reverse through the waist-level viewfinder throws me off and actually helps me with composition!
Do you like this triptych combination and layout? I think the layout could be improved if the image on the right were reversed (ha ha!, like I saw it in the TLR’s viewfinder!), with the big boulders coming from the right edge of the frame. But I’ve retained the original scene.
I hand-held the camera, so there is some blur. Next time I won’t be so lazy and will use a tripod!
Technical Details
Camera: Yashica Mat-124G medium format twin lens reflex (TLR)
Lens: 80mm (equivalent to 44mm in a 35mm camera)
B&W Film: Ilford FP4+ (ISO 125), 120mm
Developer: Rodinal, 9 mins/20 degrees C
Scanned with Nikon D750 and 60mm macro lens
F16, 1/125, ISO 125, hand-held. Yellow filter.
Lightroom for cropping, contrast, and vignette. Photoshop for some SmartSharpen
Critique Template
Use of the template is optional, but it can help spark ideas.
- Vision and Purpose:
- Conceptual:
- Emotional Impact and Mood:
- Composition:
- Balance and Visual Weight:
- Depth and Dimension:
- Color:
- Lighting:
- Processing:
- Technical: