Sunset of Totality (+revised)

Revised Version

Revision 3 (latest)

What changed: I still wasn’t quite happy with the bottom. Made the grad a harder transition and moved the transition closer to the bottom of the image. I darkened the gradient a bit more, and erased it from the cloud reflection. I think it looks more like a reverse of the sky now.

Revision 2

What changed: I also cooled the temperature in the foreground gradient to more closely replicate the sky.

Revision 1

What changed: Cropped some of the foreground, corrected perspective a tad more. Removed what was left of the foreground (did use AI remove in Lightroom).

Added after receiving feedback from the community.


Original Version

Critique Style: Standard

The photographer is looking for thoughtful feedback on the image as a whole, especially around the areas noted below.

Feedback Focus: Artistic + Technical

About This Image

I remember discovering in the first part of 2017 that we would have a total solar eclipse in my area. To say I was excited is an understatement. I knew I wanted to photograph it, but having never done photography like that before some research was in order. I did some research, made myself a ND filter suitable for shooting the sun and tested it out with the largest zoom I had at the time (400mm).

As the time drew nearer, I had an inspiration to capture an actual landscape image, during the moments of totality. I had enough equipment to do both (close-up and wide) having both the Canon 5DIV and 5DII at the time. What I had no idea of was where I could actually accomplish a shot like this. I did some more research and learned the bearing and angle above the horizon to expect when totality occurred. Fortunately, I had the Zeiss 15mm already, which is what it would take to possibly get the scene. Then I got out the maps and started searching for possible locations in northern Georgia.

After formulating a list of potential spots, I started scouting about a month beforehand. Almost all of the spots had some issue or another. Trees in the way, inaccessible property, etc. I finally discovered a place on the shore of Lake Chatuge that would work. It seems to be an improvised campsite of sorts, and while it showed signs of traffic it didn’t appear to get much use.

The day of the event I made sure to be in position early, over four hours early in fact. I spent the next few hours deciding exactly where and how I would set up for the shot. I had to position the camera very low to get any foreground at all, and still had to angle it up pretty substantially to make sure I would get the sun in a reasonable area of the frame. I had the setup for the landscape shot completed at about 12pm and draped a cloth over the setup to keep it as much out of the sun as possible.

I set up an intervalometer to capture an image every 30 seconds so I could spend my hands-on time with the telephoto equipment.

As the eclipse started approaching totality, I checked exposure and started the meter and began capturing images. In the meantime, I’m snapping away at 400mm with the other system. I really wasn’t sure what to expect with the images. I had never seen an image captured like it, although I’m sure they are out there.

As it turned out, I got some very interesting images, and was particularly surprised when an impromptu sunset occurred during totality. This image was my favorite of the series primarily due to the fact that you can actually see the dark spot in the sunburst.

Feedback Requested

I’ve never been 100% sure how I feel about this image. Certainly it is unique, but it doesn’t strike awe in me. Perhaps that’s because I’ve looked at it thousands of times. Any comments are welcome.

Technical Details

Camera: Canon EOS 5D Mark II
Lens: Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/15 ZE
Focal length: 15mm
Shutter speed: 6s
Aperture: f/13
ISO: 100

Processing software: Lightroom
Major adjustments: Graduated filters in the upper sky, and the lower part of the image.
Blending/stacking: none, single exposure
Other notes: I used as much perspective correction as possible while still maintaining some foreground. Correcting further either loses the foreground, or the image itself becomes far too narrow for my taste. I cloned out one star in the sky, I wish I had a field of stars and I would have left them. I used a little more vibrance that I normally do, trying to replicate what I remember seeing at the time.

Jonathan,

I too think this is a unique photograph. Can I assume the moment captured is as the sun is coming out of the eclipse and the extra flare is the diamond ring? The gradient in the sky is wonderful and its reflection in the water is great. The only thing that I think detracts from the photo is the FG . I might crop it out, but in doing so the reflection of the cloud is removed as well. So not sure. But it is great as is.

Visual Notes

[Crop] To remove the dark dry land.

1 Like

Youssef, Thank you for your comments. I think you might be onto something here with the crop suggestion. I’m going to play around with that and see what I come up with. I typically like to have a foreground anchor, but this image could be an exception.

The original poster added a revised version of their image.

That’s a remarkable story, Jonathan, and you got a unique image as a result. I agree with Youssef about the crop and I like your revision.

I can’t say that I’m awed by the image but I don’t think that’s a realistic goal. I don’t see how you could have done more with this eclipse than you did,

A wonderful capture that rewards a lot of careful preparation! The landscape is very nicely composed and the tonalities and colors clean and pleasing. And yes, the sky gradient is wonderful!! I do prefer the cleaner look of the revision, which keeps my eye on the spectacular subject. An in-between would be to do a short gradient burn at the bottom to add some visual weight there.

I hope you got some spectacular shots of the eclipse itself. The corona was very interesting that year, although the Baily’s beads were not great.

The original poster added a revised version of their image.

I have an image of Bailey’s Beads, and they are within 30 seconds or so of this image. I believe that is indeed the moment or very close to it.

Thank you very much for the feedback Don, your thoughts are very much appreciated.

Thank you Diane! I think you have a good point re: the bottom of the image. I just uploaded another revision doing exactly that. I did indeed get some good shots, I’ll add them to this thread later this evening.

The original poster added a revised version of their image.

The original poster added a revised version of their image.

Holy, cow…what a terrific story you’ve told. Good for you to do some homework on both finding a location as well as figuring how to shoot this eclipse with your equipment. I say well done on both fronts.
I find this a very unique image from a couple of standpoint. First, I don’t recall ever seeing sunset color on the horizon with the sun so high in the sky. That’s really interesting.
Secondly, I find the star burst effect quite interesting during an eclipse. I am not an astro guy at all but this is certainly intriguing. I love the gradation that everyone has mentioned in the sky. Beautiful and natural looking. I also quite like the simplicity of the scene after the crop. There is a lot of open sky and emptiness and I suppose that works well to direct the viewers attention to the eclipse. It works well for me and that’s what the eclipse Gods gave you.
Well, I have to say to count me in for revision number 3. I like the color of the water the best in that edit.

I think @Don_Peters said it best, "

I agree completely.

David,

Thank you very much for your comments.

Perhaps the wrong place to discuss, but I’ve found NPN to be very fulfilling thus far. The discussions are in depth and on point.

You get to a point in photography where you need to get quality feedback in order to improve your skill and/or your vision. You can only get so far by merely “looking” at other’s images and seeing how many people like yours :slight_smile: With this image in particular, I couldn’t see past what I already had, even after coming back to it several times over the years. While I’m still not awestruck by it, I am far happier with it now than I was originally. I couldn’t have achieved that without the feedback here.

It’s almost like quality control!

I think you have nailed it with the 3rd version – the gradient and the bluer water!

It"s wonderful to see another new member who is finding NPN to be very helpful! It is a unique community and I am delighted to have found it. I look forward to your participation. And a side note – other images of the eclipse that are not just variations on this same one deserve a thread of their own! Even older images are welcome for discussion.