With the worst of the gap cloned out -
Critique Style Requested: Standard
The photographer is looking for generalized feedback about the aesthetic and technical qualities of their image.
Description
Nothing too exciting here, but I did want some more eyeballs on my stacking job before I delete the source images. There is a gap, but I wonder if it’s too egregious. I probably could clone out the offending element. These are two Indian Pipe seed pods that needed 42 shots to cover adequately and leave the bg soft. I had to bend a third out of the way since it lost the pod and was just a stem. I know two of something is usually seen as too static and that threes are preferred, but alas, that other one lost its head.
Specific Feedback
Stack look ok? Should I clone in a third seed pod? lol. I have a bit of room to change the cropping if anyone has a compelling argument.
Technical Details
Tripod & in-camera focus bracketing - two sessions of 21
Lr for initial work to improve contrast and color using mostly global edits, but a mask as well to isolate the bg. Zerene for the stack and very light retouching of the DMap image with a bit of the PMax. Lr again for repeat improvements to the resulting TIF and a crop. A very clear subject like this worked well with the Beta Lens Blur tool and I softened some of the lines back there.